Three misperceptions that stall organic growth

Wealth management firms may be subtly undermining their own efforts to promote organic growth. Automation promises to give advisers more “golden time”; recruitment aims to replicate existing top performers. But what if client acquisition and wallet share expansion aren’t primarily limited by time or capability constraints?

Slow organic growth is shaped by misperceptions that disincentivise advisers from the behaviours that boost AUM. Beliefs shape thoughts; thoughts shape behaviour; and behaviour shapes performance. Every initiative that reflects existing beliefs about organic growth, and what’s required to achieve it, risks reinforcing the thought patterns that lead advisers to shy away from the exact behaviours leaders want to encourage.

Technology could drive unprecedented efficiency gains; hiring will be crucial to offset an ageing adviser population. But these are high-cost investments that should be seen as supplementary to the most urgent commercial priority: addressing the misperceptions that lead most firms to leave vast sums of AUM untapped within their existing front office.

We break these into three distinct limiting beliefs that we have frequently observed in our work over the last 23 years:

1. “Organic growth is too hard to be worth it”

Most advisers work at the peak of their capacity. Time and energy not taken up with administrative tasks and client service are often required to support ongoing integration following their firm’s latest round of M&A.

Even if advisers did have time to focus on growth, they often believe they lack the specific skills required to succeed. Nearly half of UK advisers believe regulatory pressure would need to ease for them to generate organic growth.¹ US advisers often have similar beliefs, assuming the combination of restrictive compliance requirements and a lack of time makes organic growth an uphill battle.

The problem is exacerbated by remuneration structures that reward client retention over growth. Roughly 86% of advisers today are paid primarily as a percentage of their AUM.² Advisers with large books can simply retain their clients and increase their earnings through market growth.

If advisers believe winning new clients or increasing wallet share is difficult, the temptation to benefit from passive gains is hard to resist. But the incentive structure is further complicated by a system designed to make compensation fairer.

Strictly proportionate AUM-based fees create a tension: an adviser managing 2x larger investments is not necessarily doing twice the work. 58% of firms use a graduated fee structure to solve that problem, charging progressively less as a client’s assets grow.³

Yet that means organic growth is not just hard to achieve; it’s progressively less beneficial to the advisers carving out time in their busy schedules to generate it. This sets up an irony: advisers with bigger books, who may be the best positioned to drive organic growth, are the least incentivised to do so.

How to correct the misperception

The reality is advisers are often correct to feel sceptical about the realistic net gain organic efforts can generate for them. Unless they have truly world-class commercial skills, adding enough AUM to double their salary will take Olympian efforts and a healthy dose of luck.

Instead, firms should focus on smaller gains that are well within reach. For example, SBR discovered one firm could add £1.9M AUM per adviser with relative ease. If the firm takes 1% of AUM as revenue and pays the adviser 50%, that minor effort adds £9.3k to the adviser’s annual earnings.

While hardly life-changing for most advisers, that’s a reasonable gain for little work. And across 100+ advisers, that nets £185M AUM growth for the firm.

2. “Clients don’t want to be asked for referrals”

Referrals account for nearly 70% of new clients for advisers,⁴ and nearly one-third of high-net-worth investors rely exclusively on referrals to find their financial adviser.⁵ Yet advisers underuse them; most simply wait for clients to offer a referral, turning the most valuable source of organic growth into a passive strategy.

That passivity is driven by a mistaken belief that clients will be put off if advisers actively request a referral. Some suspect it will feel too salesey; others fear it will give the relationship a transactional edge and harm client loyalty.

In reality, giving referrals makes clients feel good and can actually improve the relationship. Our experience suggests that roughly 90% of clients are happy to make a referral, yet just 30% of advisers ask them for one.

The problem is that not asking for referrals sends an unclear message to clients. Given that most advisers work at or near full capacity and struggle to give their existing clients enough face time, plenty of clients may assume they lack the availability or aren’t taking on new clients.

Equally, a passive stance toward referrals forces clients to identify the need for an adviser. The standard scenarios that cause people to seek advice, such as an inheritance or divorce, are far from the only times clients might feel their friends or family might benefit from financial advice.

How to correct the misperception

Simply telling advisers their clients are more willing to make referrals than they realise can generate some improvements. But to drive real behaviour change, you need to reduce the perceived awkwardness.

Not asking for referrals is itself a habit of thought: a new set of behaviours is required to change it. Leaders should provide a repeatable script or framework for introducing the topic, as well as coaching advisers through their first few efforts to offer feedback if the process feels difficult.

3. “Great business winners are born, not made”

The culture within wealth management valorizes individual talent. Smaller firms are often built around a single charismatic adviser, while larger firms typically have a handful of well-known top performers.

That concentration of success breeds fatalism. Advisers who acquire fewer, or lower-value, clients often believe their performance is inevitable; they simply lack the nebulous set of gifts required to attract and retain an exceptional book of business.

This belief may be the toughest to combat, because it contains an undeniable grain of truth: some advisers really do have stronger commercial capabilities. But the belief also contains two false assumptions that often unnecessarily limit advisers.

The first is all-or-nothing thinking: advisers don’t have to build a hero-level book to make substantial gains. Many advisers could generate far more organic growth with focused development of the commercial capabilities they have real potential to build.

The second is treating performance as a single category. Advisers don’t need to thrive across every area to generate significant organic growth. New client wins often garner disproportionate attention, but advisers who are skilled at growing wallet share or retaining clients also play important roles in organic growth initiatives.

How to correct the misperception

Firms must demonstrate that the capabilities that produce growth are not innate gifts; they can be identified, measured, and developed. SBR’s GTM Capability Accelerator™ offers a clear path to achieve that goal.

We assess each individual adviser’s psychometric profile, commercial skills, and organic growth performance. That allows us to pinpoint the capabilities that influence organic growth within your specific context, and quantify each adviser’s potential to improve their performance based on their current capabilities and psychometrics.

Importantly, we do this through an initial pilot project that serves as proof of concept. Rather than investing in a firm-wide initiative, we can show how the model finds and realises untapped potential within a subset of advisers.

This shows advisers that their assumptions about what drives growth may be mistaken. It shows leaders that there is far more untapped potential within their front office. And it shows investors that the firm can deliver behaviour change and improve organic growth.

The model has been proven across numerous firms:

One wealth planning client achieved 8.7% AUM growth within 12 months.
One assessment revealed a £1.23bn modelled AUM growth opportunity from improving adviser productivity.
One global wealth management firm generated 650% ROI.

Curious how much untapped potential exists within your front office?

Book a Consultation